rippleconcept

For Christmas I got an interesting present from a friend - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me provided by my pal Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and very funny in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of writing, but it's also a bit repeated, and extremely verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet's triggers in collating information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, since pivoting from compiling AI -generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can purchase any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody developing one in anybody's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, oke.zone created by AI, and created "exclusively to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, but Mr Mashiach worries that the item is intended as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get offered further.

He intends to widen his range, producing various genres such as sci-fi, and possibly offering an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted type of customer AI - selling AI-generated items to human clients.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, you write for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable content based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we in fact mean human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think using generative AI for imaginative functions should be prohibited, but I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without approval should be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely powerful but let's develop it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for oke.zone their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually picked to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually chosen to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to utilize creators' content on the internet to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise strongly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of happiness," states the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening one of its best performing industries on the unclear guarantee of growth."

A federal government representative said: "No move will be made up until we are absolutely positive we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our goals: increased control for right holders to help them license their content, access to top quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI plan, a national information library consisting of public data from a wide variety of sources will also be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to increase the security of AI with, among other things, firms in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is said to desire the AI sector to deal with less guideline.

This comes as a variety of claims against AI firms, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, morphomics.science and even a comic.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their approval, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of factors which can constitute reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training data and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It became one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its innovation for a portion of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It has lots of inaccuracies and classifieds.ocala-news.com hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to read in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But provided how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm uncertain the length of time I can stay positive that my substantially slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC reporters around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.